<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ghosted Notes &#187; Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ghostednotes.com/category/accessibility/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ghostednotes.com</link>
	<description>The writings of a technology ronin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:30:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Cloak of Accessibility</title>
		<link>http://ghostednotes.com/2009/02/16/A-Cloak-of-Accessibility</link>
		<comments>http://ghostednotes.com/2009/02/16/A-Cloak-of-Accessibility#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Panulla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostednotes.com/2009/02/16/A-Cloak-of-Accessibility</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you regularly run your browser with JavaScript support disabled like I do, you&#8217;ll occasionally run into a Web site that completely fails to operate, especially among so-called Web 2.0 sites. I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve ever noticed, but Twitter.com is not the most accessible site on the Web. I find that somewhat odd, given [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you regularly run your browser with JavaScript support disabled like I do, you&#8217;ll occasionally run into a Web site that completely fails to operate, especially among so-called Web 2.0 sites.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve ever noticed, but <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter.com</a> is not the most accessible site on the Web. I find that somewhat odd, given the relative simplicity of the user interface. This has improved a bit in the 18 months or so that <a href="http://twitter.com/bpanulla">I&#8217;ve been using the service</a>, but I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s perfect yet. At least the site functionality gracefully degrades when you don&#8217;t have JavaScript.</p>
<p>Enter <a href="http://www.checkengineusa.com/dennislembree/">Dennis Embree</a>. Seeing a need, or at least an opportunity, he created a more accessible Web-based Twitter interface: <a href="http://accessibletwitter.com/">AccessibleTwitter.com</a></p>
<p>The site contains a short <a href="http://accessibletwitter.com/about.php">list of some of the things the developers fixed</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li>All links are keyboard accessible.</li>
<li>Simple, consistent layout and navigation.</li>
<li>Works with or without JavaScript.</li>
<li>Large default text size and high color contrast.</li>
<li>Looks great in high or low resolution.</li>
<li>Forms are marked up for optimal accessibility.</li>
<li>Code is semantic, light, and adheres to best practices in Web Standards.</li>
</ul>
<p>I wonder if there is a niche here for accessibility-aware Web developers: find Web 2.0 sites that brush off demands for accessibility affordances and wrap them in a &#8220;cloak of accessibility&#8221; spun from their own APIs.</p>
<p>I think this is a really interesting idea. I wonder what other sites could benefit from such a technique?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ghostednotes.com/2009/02/16/A-Cloak-of-Accessibility/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

